The New Middle East
Our media is screaming these days about a map published in Armed Forces Journal that depicts the ‘New Middle East’. This became food for blame-game for the opposition and they started making mountains out of the mole without confirming the authencity and validity of the map, and it’s creator.
The map was published in an article titled Blood Borders in June 2006 issue of American Forces Journal. Author of this article is Ralph Peteres, a retired US army Lieutenant Colonel, novelist and essayist.
Ralph spent ten years in Germany in military intelligence, attended Officer Candidate School and received his commission, eventually attending the Command and General Staff College and U.S. Army War College. His last assignment was to the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence. He retired in 1998 with the rank of Lieutenant Colonel.
He took up ficition writing after retirement. His novels progressed from futuristic scenarios involving the Red Army to contemporary terrorism and failed state issues. His characters are often presented as military mavericks who have the clairvoyance and courage to tackle problems others can’t or won’t.
Running wild with imagination, Peters came up with his solution for Middle East issues, creating ‘A New Middle East’ based on ethnic division of the region. According to him, the new borders are drawn ‘to reflect the natural ties of blood and faith’, and to undo the great wrongs done by French and English in the 20th century.
Here is how he perceives the Middle East to be:
Israel: Israel will return to its pre-1967 borders.
Free Kurdish State: A Free Kurdish State would be formed between the Balkan Mountains and the Himalayas, taking parts from Syria, Turkey and Iraq. A Free Kurdistan, stretching from Diyarbakir through Tabriz, would be the most pro-Western state between Bulgaria and Japan.
Arab Shia State: The Shia south of old Iraq would form the basis of an Arab Shia State rimming much of the Persian Gulf. It will also get the oil fields of Saudi Arabia.
Syria: Syria will lose some parts to the new Kurdish state and Greater Lebanon. It may be joined by Iraq’s three Sunni-majority provinces.
Yemen: Yemen will get part of Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabia will be disintegrated by giving some of its parts to Jordan, forming Islamic Sacred State and a State for the House of Saud. Saudi Arabia’s coastal oil fields will be given to the Shia Arabs who populate that subregion, while a southeastern quadrant would go to Yemen.
House of Saud: Confined to a rump Saudi Homelands Independent Territory around Riyadh.
Islamic Sacred State: Mecca and Medina will be ruled by a rotating council representative of the world’s major Muslim schools and movements in an Islamic Sacred State — a sort of Muslim super-Vatican.
Iran: The New Persia: Iran would lose a great deal of territory to Unified Azerbaijan, Free Kurdistan, the Arab Shia State and Free Baluchistan, but would gain the provinces around Herat in today’s Afghanistan — a region with a historical and linguistic affinity for Persia. Iran would, in effect, become an ethnic Persian state again, with the most difficult question being whether or not it should keep the port of Bandar Abbas or surrender it to the Arab Shia State.
Afghanistan: What Afghanistan would lose to Persia in the west, it would gain in the east, as Pakistan’s Northwest Frontier tribes would be reunited with their Afghan brethren.
Pakistan: Pakistan will loose Balochistan to the Free Balochistan state and NWFP to Afghanistan. The remaining “natural” Pakistan would lie entirely east of the Indus, except for a westward spur near Karachi.
United Arab Emirates: Part of the Emirates might be incorporated in the Arab Shia State ringing much of the Persian Gulf. Dubai would be allowed to retain its playground status for rich debauchees. Kuwait would remain within its current borders, as would Oman.
WHO WINS, WHO LOSES
Winners:
Afghanistan, Arab Shia State, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Free Baluchistan, Free Kurdistan, Iran, Islamic Sacred State, Jordan, Lebanon, Yemen
Losers:
Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Kuwait, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, West Bank
Other posts by Kashif Aziz
- Pakistan edging towards another Military Rule? - Part 2 - August 30th, 2008
- Pakistan edging towards another Military Rule? - Part 1 - August 29th, 2008
- Say No to Electricity Bills - August 28th, 2008
- Tanzeem Naqvi resigned from KESC - August 28th, 2008
- Pakistan faces severe Power Crisis - August 27th, 2008
- NATO Vehicles Burned at Maripur Karachi - August 27th, 2008
- Dr. Aafia Siddiqui and her son interrogated by Afghans - August 25th, 2008
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs updates on Dr. Aafia Siddiqui - August 23rd, 2008
- Pervez Musharraf resigns as President of Pakistan - August 18th, 2008
- Clarification by US Consulate in Pakistan on Dr. Aafia Siddiqui's Abducation - August 17th, 2008
Thank you for reading this post. You can now Read Comment (1) or Leave A Trackback.
Post Info
This entry was posted on Monday, August 28th, 2006 and is filed under Current Affairs . Tagged with:You can follow any responses to this entry through the Comments Feed . You can Leave A Comment, or A Trackback.
Previous Post: Nawab Akbar Bugti Killed »
Next Post: Rauf Mengal: Parlimentarian who listened to Voice of Heart »
- United States DoJ confirms identity of Dr. Aafia Siddiqui’s son, but he denies it
- Asif Ali Zardari: encircled with Controversies before being a President
- Pakistan edging towards another Military Rule? - Part 2
- Short term interests
- Pakistan edging towards another Military Rule? - Part 1
- Rare Chink in FATA
- Presidential Campaigns Pick Momentum
- Say No to Electricity Bills
- Tanzeem Naqvi resigned from KESC
- On Losing Ahmed Faraz







August 28th, 2006 11:44 GMT
That may be a wish list of a novelist or long term plan of a super power. Couple of years ago there were similar report published by a US think tank about a New world to be made before 2010 which predicted about pakistan, iraq and iran. Interestingly, all the prediction are going true. Its evident that the report by the US think tank was not just an analysis, rather it was a strategic plan being adopted by US and its allies. The newspapers in pakistan raised hue and cry at that time also.
In any case, one thing which is sure. When a nation falls in anarchy, fails to deliver justice and go astray from the path defined by Allah Almighty, its punished and replaced by people who are better. unfortunately, Right now, atleast pakistan falls in this category.