Canada Against Scarf
The conservative government of Canada has devised a draft of constitution which will restrict Muslim women who wear scarf to poll their votes. This debate was going along for some time in Canada, and a tussle was going on between Election Commission of Canada and the Canadian government, and now they have decided to take this decision, and only those people will be exempted from these laws, who have some provable medical reasons to hide their face.
This debate regarding scarf was started in the Quebec province of Canada, where mainly French language is spoken in last year’s September, and which has formed the basis for this Draconian law. Canada’s image was very nice in the outside world, and it was considered a democratic, tolerant, broad-minded, secular, non-religious and congenial country, but this law has negated all those images, and now Canada is just yet another Western country.
One wonders where all those so-called democratic norms and traditions have gone. The truth is that instead of Muslim countries, Western Christian states are very rigid and anti-Muslims and they are highly intolerant of what Muslims represent. They cannot for the heck of it tolerate Hijabs and beards, and that is why Canada has unmasked herself and joined the league. Muslim countries are not fundamentalists and rigid, rather they are busy like hell in mimicking the superficial Western values, and trying to copycat their apparent traditions.
The hypocrite and dual approach of Western governments is beyond comprehension. Scarf is also worn by the Christians nuns, and even common people wear it in Canada, where temperature often remains at freezing point. Incidentally, no Canadian or any other Muslim organization has voiced their reaction against this law, and don’t talk about OIC, because OIC is just another puppet of US.
Other posts by Commoner
- Israeli Massacre Goes On - January 7th, 2009
- Gilani's Fight - January 7th, 2009
- Unfortunate Remarks - January 6th, 2009
- Collective Urgency - January 6th, 2009
- Dismal Performance, Huge Rewards - January 5th, 2009
- Blood in Gaza - January 4th, 2009
- Troops Movement Should be Halted - January 3rd, 2009
- Reconciliation Joke - January 3rd, 2009
- Bent on War - January 3rd, 2009
- Attack on the Victim - January 2nd, 2009
Thank you for reading this post. You can now Read Comments (4) or Leave A Trackback.
Post Info
This entry was posted on Sunday, October 28th, 2007 and is filed under Current Affairs, Lifestyle . Tagged with:You can follow any responses to this entry through the Comments Feed . You can Leave A Comment, or A Trackback.
Previous Post: Swat Operation »
Next Post: Swat Recoils »
- Durrani Crisis Exacerbates
- Respect, fame and wealth — All for Zardari
- Why were a few thousand Jews missing on 9/11?
- Aatma, Bhoot and Roohein
- Amateurish Websites on Black Magic
- Israeli Massacre Goes On
- Gilani’s Fight
- Jahil Traffic Police wala of Karachi
- Unfortunate Remarks
- Why eating fats is actually good for you????







October 28th, 2007 21:49 GMT
This debate regarding scarf was started in the Quebec province of Canada, where mainly French language is spoken i
nuff said
October 29th, 2007 00:54 GMT
Fahd,
It would be prudent for you to check a little before you publish such stuff on a website.There is not a single link to any story.On top of that, what you have written is just plain out tosh.
http://www.thestar.com/News/article/271037
Only VOTING for women in an all encompassing Bhurka(i.e where you can’t see their face at all) has been disallowed, simply because it is impossible to know who the voter is.Next time, you might not want to be such a sensationalist.
October 29th, 2007 04:17 GMT
Can’t they just get some female official verify the identity of a burqa-clad female?
October 29th, 2007 23:36 GMT
i believe that is what they intend to do when there are female officials available.However, if there are no female officials available, I think they will have to show their face to the official.
There’s probably about a few dozen burqa clad women in the whole of the country.Both sides have made an ugly fuss about it’s ramifications, when very little of substance exists.